Red Flags to Watch For When You Hire Developers Abroad > 공지사항

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

A quote that comes back within a day counts as a red flag rather than good service. A competent team responds with questions first: about who owns the data and what happens on failure. A vendor that commits to a figure without asking anything is simply guessing, and that guess will be corrected later — on your budget.

Watch for a mismatch between the team in the pitch and those who eventually appear in the repository. Ask for specific people rather than roles in the agreement, with a clause that requires notice before anyone is swapped. A vendor that will only describe roles and will not commit to specific engineers is keeping the right to assign anyone it likes.

Require commit-level visibility from the first week. A partner that hands over a build only at the end of each phase expects you to trust a black box. Visible commits show you the actual pace far better than a slide deck. The same holds for the CI pipeline: if there is no pipeline, quality claims are nothing more than words.

Loose contract language around code ownership is rarely a formality. The agreement should state in plain terms that the code, hire remote developers designs and documentation belong to the client upon settlement of the relevant invoice. Look too at the governing law and public sector software development how payments are structured: a large upfront payment with no deliverable attached eliminates your only leverage.

Finally, pay attention to the working rhythm. Ask what overlap the teams will share with your timezone, which named person handles day-to-day questions and how quickly. Some genuine overlap generally works; zero overlap converts a five-minute question into a twenty-four hour round trip. Careless writing in the sales phase does not improve under delivery pressure.